Success in Cinema has long been measured in two very different ways. For some, it is the collection of ticket sales, sold-out screenings and every seat in the cinema being used. For others, it is defined by nominations, critical praise, and awards-season recognition, knowing you will be remembered forever. However, what happens when these two measures do not align? In a politically charged global climate, does relevance outweigh popularity?
One Battle After Another presents a prime example from this year’s awards season. Despite underperforming at the box office, losing $100 million in theatrical runs, and dividing general audiences, it has already secured multiple major nominations and wins, earning significant recognition for its direction, screenplay, and performances. Its exploration of corruption, power, and resistance feels especially relevant in today’s political climate, where questions about leadership and inequality are at the forefront of debate. However, its challenging themes and tone may have limited its public appreciation whilst captivating the eyes of critics and awards voters.
Following the awards recognition for One Battle After Another, it becomes interesting to compare it with films that have the complete opposite trajectory. Wicked: For Good proved to be a major box office success, grossing over $527 million in the first three months, grabbing people’s attention from everywhere. Its established fanbase, musical spectacle and cultural familiarity ensured ticket sales. However, despite its popularity, it failed to secure a single Oscar Nomination and only secured one BAFTA nomination. This contrast highlights how commercial appeal doesn’t automatically translate into award recognition, particularly when films are viewed as entertainment-driven rather than artistically groundbreaking.
In contrast, Sinners managed to achieve what many films struggle to balance: both commercial momentum and awards recognition. Performing strongly at the box office whilst breaking the record for the most Oscar Nominations in a single season (16), it appealed to general audiences without sacrificing critical credibility. Its success suggests that films can tackle complex themes and still connect with wide audiences when the storytelling feels engaging and emotionally resonant. Rather than distancing viewers, depth and ambition can enhance a film’s impact when they are supported by strong performances and a clear narrative focus.
So, where does this leave the original question: what makes a film successful? Is it the packed cinemas and impressive revenue of Wicked: For Good, the awards recognition of One Battle After Another, or the rare balance achieved by Sinners?
The truth is, success in cinema is no longer one-dimensional. Box office numbers show what audiences are willing to pay to see, while Oscar nominations reflect what the industry chooses to celebrate. When those outcomes don’t align, it doesn’t necessarily mean one film is better than another — it simply reveals that audiences and awards bodies often prioritise different qualities.
Beyond revenue and recognition, however, there is a more personal measure of success. We can point to technical achievements, performances, direction or cultural relevance, but often the real reason a film matters is harder to articulate. It is the feeling it leaves behind — whether it unsettles, inspires, challenges or comforts. Perhaps a film can truly be called successful not only when it wins awards or sells tickets, but when it connects in a way that stays with us long after the screen fades to black.